Filters
Question type

McKenzie worked in a service station.Changing a customer's tire,he over-inflated it,causing it to explode.This severely injured his left hand.Neither the tire nor the rim was found to be defective.In a lawsuit against the tire manufacturer McKenzie will likely:


A) lose due to product abuse
B) win under a strict liability or a negligence standard
C) lose under strict liability but win under negligence
D) win due to implied warranty of safety
E) lose due to assumption of the risk

F) D) and E)
G) A) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In MDM Group v.CX Reinsurance,where CX quit writing ski season insurance,which causes MDM to lose insurance business it could have had,the court held CX liable to its insurance clients,not to MDM,for interference with prospective advantage.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A __________ is a manufacturer's assurance that a product will meet certain quality and performance standards.


A) certificate of quality
B) certificate of use
C) warranty
D) pledge
E) none of the other choices are correct

F) C) and D)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

If,instead of allowing a plaintiff to sue all manufacturers of a given product,a court allows defendants to bring in other manufacturers as defendants,this is known as:


A) unknown hazard share liability
B) defect sharing liability
C) joint and several liability
D) strict liability
E) express liability

F) D) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Most tort suits are filed in:


A) state courts
B) federal courts
C) appellate courts
D) small claims courts
E) municipal courts

F) All of the above
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In a case alleging interference with a contractual relation,the defendant must have known the plaintiff had a contract with a third party.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The ________________ relieves a manufacturer of liability for failing to warn of a product's characteristics or dangers when "the end user knows or reasonably should know of a product's dangers"


A) naΓ―ve user defense
B) smart user defense
C) intelligent user defense
D) sophisticated user defense
E) informed user defense

F) A) and E)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

A warranty is an assurance from the manufacturer that its products will meet certain quality standards.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The __________________ holds that the bulk supplier has a duty to take reasonable steps to insure that its buyer is knowledgeable and equipped to provide warnings to the ultimate users,but it does not have to police the details of what is done as the product continues down the chain of use.


A) commercial-supplier doctrine
B) final-supplier doctrine
C) bulk-supplier doctrine
D) small-scale supplier doctrine
E) Wal-Mart-supplier doctrine

F) A) and E)
G) B) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

There are no defenses available in strict liability cases;manufacturers must pay whenever a consumer is injured.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In Baxter v.Ford Motor,where Baxter lost an eye because the glass in his car windshield was not shatterproof as Ford had claimed,Ford's liability was based on:


A) negligence in construction
B) misrepresentation in advertisements
C) privity in warranty
D) fraud in sales
E) none of the other choices

F) A) and C)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The __________________ holds that the bulk supplier has a duty to take reasonable steps to insure that its buyer is knowledgeable and equipped to provide warnings to the ultimate users,but it does not have to police the details of what is done as the product continues down the chain of use.


A) commercial-supplier doctrine
B) final-supplier doctrine
C) Wal-Mart-supplier doctrine
D) small-scale supplier doctrine
E) none of the other choices are correct

F) A) and E)
G) B) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Not only must manufacturers produce products safely,they must also think about how consumers might misuse the products and then warn consumers not to engage in these kinds of dangerous activities.

A) True
B) False

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The case that led in adopting a general rule imposing strict liability in tort was:


A) Morriss v.Akers
B) Greenman v.Yuba Power
C) MacPherson v.Buick Motor Company
D) MDM Group Associates v.CX Reinsurance Company
E) Johnson v.Chevrolet

F) A) and B)
G) C) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In MacPherson v.Buick,where the wheel on a new Buick collapsed,causing the car to crash,injuring MacPherson,the court of appeals held MacPherson could sue:


A) Buick for negligence under contract law
B) Buick for negligence under tort law
C) Buick for strict liability under contract law
D) Buick for strict liability under tort law
E) the wheel maker,not Buick,for negligence in product construction

F) B) and E)
G) C) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Meddling with another's business in an unreasonable and improper manner to improve one's own place in the market it an example of the tort of:


A) interference with prospective advantage
B) interference with competition
C) interference with business practices
D) interference with intent
E) none of the other choices

F) B) and C)
G) D) and E)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Defenses against strict liability include(s) :


A) product abuse
B) assumption of risk
C) sophisticated user
D) all of the other specific choices are possible
E) none of the other choices;there is no defense for strict liability

F) B) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Activity that "necessarily involves a risk of serious harm to the person,land,or chattels of another,which cannot be eliminated by the exercise of the utmost care" and "is not a matter of common usage" is called:


A) metahazardous activity
B) superhazardous activity
C) ultrahazardous activity
D) megahazardous activity
E) none of the other choices are correct

F) B) and E)
G) A) and B)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

The ___________________ is primarily concerned with harms suffered by buyers and other persons who use defective products.


A) law of stock protection
B) law of malpractice liability
C) law of seller liability
D) law of commercial liability
E) none of the other choices are completely correct

F) A) and E)
G) A) and C)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

In ASC Construction Equipment USA v.City Commercial Real Estate,where City sued ASC for tortious interference with business relations,the appeals court held that City:


A) could not sue for tortious interference because ASC was not a stranger to the business
Relationship at issue
B) could sue for tortious interference because ASC was not a stranger to the business
Relationship at issue
C) had be defrauded by ASC
D) could not sue ASC because one business cannot sue another
E) none of the other choices are correct

F) A) and D)
G) B) and D)

Correct Answer

verifed

verified

Showing 41 - 60 of 376

Related Exams

Show Answer